COMPETENT AUTHORITY AGREEMENT
The competent authorities of Brazil and the Netherlands (hereinafter: the ‘Competent
Authorities’) have reached the following mutual agreement (hereinafter: ‘Competent
Authority Agreement’) regarding the application of the Convention between the Kingdom
of the Netherlands and the Federative Republic of Brazil for the avoidance of double
taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income signed
on 8 March 1990 (hereinafter: the ‘Convention’) in relation to payments of interest
on net equity (in Portuguese: Juros sobre o Capital Próprio, hereinafter: ‘JCP’) by a company which is a resident of Brazil to a resident of
the Netherlands. This Competent Authority Agreement is entered into under paragraph
3 of Article 25 (Mutual Agreement Procedure) of the Convention.
JCP was introduced in Brazilian law (by Art. 9 of Lei nº 9249/1995) after conclusion
of the Convention. Therefore, the Convention does not specifically address whether,
under the Convention, JCP should be considered as a dividend as defined in paragraph
3 of Article 10, or as interest as defined in paragraph 4 of Article 11 of the Convention.
JCP is a remuneration that a company organized under Brazilian law can elect to pay
to its shareholders on the basis of the net equity of the company. Since JCP is calculated
on the basis of the net equity of the company and paid to shareholders only in the
existence of profits of the current period, accumulated earnings or profit reserves
of previous periods, it could raise doubts whether it can be qualified as a dividend
(Art. 10 of the Convention) or interest (Art. 11).
After discussing the issue, among other reasons, the competent authorities considered
that the following elements should be taken into consideration for the qualification
of JCP.
First, JCP is treated as interest for Brazilian tax purposes, meaning that JCP is
deductible for the payer and taxable with the payee for corporate income tax (in Portuguese:
Imposto de Renda das Pessoas Jurídicas) and social contribution on the net profits (in Portuguese: Contribuição Social Sobre o Lucro Líquido) purposes, and that withholding tax is levied on JCP.
Second, Art. 10(3) and Art. 11(4) of the Convention read as follows:
Art. 10 Dividends – 3. The term ‘dividends’ as used in this Article means income from
shares, ‘jouissance’ shares or ‘jouissance’ rights, mining shares, founders' shares
or other rights, not being debt-claims, participating in profits, as well as income
from other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income
from shares by the laws of the State of which the company making the distribution
is a resident.
Art. 11 Interest – 4. The term ‘interest’ as used in this Article means income from
government securities, bonds or debentures, whether or not secured by mortgage and
whether or not carrying a right to participate in profits, and debt-claims of every
kind as well as other income assimilated to income from money lent by the taxation law
of the Contracting State in which the income arises.
Thus, in specific cases, the Convention indicates that the qualification should follow
the taxation treatment of the residence country of the company making the distribution
of dividends or the residence country of the payer of the interest.
Considering the above, the Competent Authorities wish to clarify the treatment of
JCP under the Convention. The Competent Authorities have agreed that for the purpose
of applying the Convention, in accordance with Brazilian tax law, JCP is considered
interest within the meaning of paragraph 4 of Article 11 of the Convention.
Agreed by the undersigned Competent Authorities:
|
Date:
|
3-12-2021
|
(Brasilia)
|
Date:
|
29-8-2021
|
(The Hague)
|
|
For the competent authority of Brazil
|
For the competent authority of the Netherlands
|
|
José Barroso Tostes Neto
|
Reijer Janssen
|
|
Special Secretary of the Federal Revenue of Brazil
|
Ministry of Finance
|
